June 3-5, 2022

Ruston, Louisiana

35th Annual ASCE Concrete Canoe Competition Society-Wide Finals

Home › 35th Annual ASCE Concrete Canoe Competition Society-Wide Finals › Media and Results

Home | Schedule | Hotels and Residence Halls | FAQs | Maps | Sponsors |  Mailers |  Contact Us | Contact Louisiana Tech

Media and Results

Media

Video

Local Ruston TV News Video

Photos

ASCE Concrete Canoe+ Photos

Podcasts

Getting ready for the 2022 ASCE concrete canoe competition | ASCE

Elizabeth Matthews and Katya Opel: The Concrete Canoe Competition

Articles

ASCE teams from around the world compete in Ruston

Cal Poly SLO makes concrete canoe history | ASCE

Send your photos and media to student@asce.org for inclusion here.

Results

The Concrete Canoe Competition+ page lists all the winners and will continue to be updated with articles and photos.

Overall Results
Overall
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
  2. Université Laval
  3. Western Kentucky University
  4. Youngstown State University
  5. New York University – Tandon
Enhanced Focus Area
  • Western Kentucky University
Oral Technical Presentation
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
  2. Université Laval
  3. Colorado School of Mines
  4. Texas A&M University
  5. University of Nevada, Reno
R. John Craig Legacy Award
  • California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Technical Proposal
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
  2. Université Laval
  3. New York University – Tandon
  4. Youngstown State University
  5. Western Kentucky University
Spirit of the Competition
  • Lipscomb University
Final Product Prototype
  1. New York University – Tandon
  2. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
  3. Western Kentucky University
  4. Université Laval
  5. Youngstown State University

Concrete Canoe

Full Results PDF

Project Proposal
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  2. Université Laval
  3. New York University – Tandon
  4. Youngstown State University
  5. Western Kentucky University
  6. University of Nevada, Reno
  7. Texas A&M University
  8. University of British Columbia
  9. Colorado School of Mines
  10. Lipscomb University

 

Standings—Women’s Final Sprints
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  2. Université Laval
  3. Youngstown State University
  4. University of Nevada, Reno
  5. Western Kentucky University
  6. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
  7. University at Buffalo
  8. Louisiana Tech University
  9. Texas A&M University
  10. Lipscomb University
Standings—Women’s Slalom Race
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  2. University of Nevada, Reno
  3. Université Laval
  4. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
  5. Western Kentucky University
  6. Louisiana Tech University
  7. Youngstown State University
  8. University at Buffalo
  9. Texas A&M University
  10. Lipscomb University
Technical Presentation
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  2. Université Laval
  3. Colorado School of Mines
  4. Texas A&M University
  5. University of Nevada, Reno
  6. Youngstown State University
  7. Western Kentucky University
  8. New York University – Tandon
  9. University of British Columbia
  10. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
Standings—Men’s Final Sprints
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  2. Université Laval
  3. Youngstown State University
  4. Western Kentucky University
  5. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
  6. Louisiana Tech University
  7. Fairmont State University
  8. Lipscomb University
  9. Texas A&M University
  10. University of Nevada, Reno
Standings—Men’s Slalom Race
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  2. Louisiana Tech University
  3. Youngstown State University
  4. Université Laval
  5. University at Buffalo
  6. University of Nevada, Reno
  7. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
  8. Western Kentucky University
  9. Texas A&M University
  10. United States Naval Academy
Enhanced Focus Areas
  1. Western Kentucky University
  2. University of British Columbia
  3. New York University – Tandon
  4. Université Laval
  5. University of Nevada, Reno
  6. Youngstown State University
  7. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  8. Kansas State University
  9. Texas A&M University
  10. Colorado School of Mines
Standings—Coed Final Sprints
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
  2. Université Laval
  3. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
  4. Western Kentucky University
  5. Youngstown State University
  6. Louisiana Tech University
  7. United States Naval Academy
  8. University at Buffalo
  9. Texas A&M University
  10. Milwaukee School of Engineering
Race Points—Sorted by Race Points
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  2. Université Laval
  3. Youngstown State University
  4. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
  5. Western Kentucky University
  6. Louisiana Tech University
  7. University of Nevada, Reno
  8. University at Buffalo
  9. Texas A&M University
  10. United States Naval Academy
Final Product Prototype
  1. New York University – Tandon
  2. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  3. Western Kentucky University
  4. Université Laval
  5. Youngstown State University
  6. Texas A&M University
  7. Fairmont State University
  8. United States Naval Academy
  9. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
  10. University of Nevada, Reno
Final Summary—Sorted by Rank
  1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
  2. Université Laval
  3. Western Kentucky University
  4. Youngstown State University
  5. New York University – Tandon
  6. Texas A&M University
  7. University of Nevada, Reno
  8. University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez
  9. Colorado School of Mines
  10. University of British Columbia

Documents

Impressed by a team’s presentation? Check out the technical proposals from all 22 registered teams.

Interested in additional feedback and insights on improving your canoe for the future? Send an e-mail to concretecanoe@asce.org by the end of the week, and we will add you to the list for a Zoom call with the judges later this month.

Thank you again to everyone who put their time and energy into continuing this incredible tradition – we hope you enjoyed it as much as we did – see you next year in Wisconsin!